Show the evidence.
Earn the interview.
Four prompts for honest resume critique, stronger bullet points and a targeted final review.
The Claude Resume Prompt Kit
The video promises the prompts used to review a resume against a job description. This kit provides them as copy-ready starting points. AI can help edit and compare documents, but it cannot know a recruiter’s private screening rules or produce a valid “ATS score out of 100” unless an actual scoring system is provided.
One useful step at a time.
- 01Upload evidence
- 02Find weak spots
- 03Rewrite bullets
- 04Check the match
Prepare the source material
Upload your resume and the exact job description, or paste both into one Claude conversation. Remove personal identifiers if they are not needed for the writing task. Add accurate metrics you can defend, links to work samples and constraints such as page length.
Act as a careful resume editor for this role. Read my resume and the job description. Identify the three biggest gaps a reviewer might notice quickly. Quote the resume evidence for each. Do not assume the company uses any particular ATS rule.
Rewrite experience without inventing results
A strong bullet usually names an action, the situation and the outcome. The “XYZ” formula mentioned in the video is a useful shape: accomplished X, measured by Y, by doing Z. A metric is optional if you do not have one; specific scope and outcome are still valuable.
Rewrite my experience bullets for this role. Start with concrete actions, show scope and outcome, and use only facts from my resume or the extra evidence below. Mark missing metrics as [add verified metric] instead of inventing them. Preserve my level of responsibility.
Read each rewritten bullet against your source material. If the claim sounds stronger than what you actually did, change it.
Check fit and clarity
Ask Claude to compare the resume with the requirements. A score can be a rough editorial aid only if you define the rubric; it is not an employer’s ATS score.
Compare this resume with the job description using a transparent rubric: required skills 40%, relevant experience 35%, evidence and specificity 25%. Explain each subscore and list exact evidence from my resume. Treat the result as an editorial estimate, not an ATS prediction. Then identify sections to improve.
Rewrite my summary in three concise options for this role. Lead with verified strengths and relevant proof. Avoid hype, generic adjectives and claims I cannot support.
Final check: dates, titles, contact details, links, grammar, accessibility and any claim that would need explanation in an interview.
Sources & notes
Product details were checked on 5 October 2026. Menus, plans, and integrations can change. The video is the source of the lead-magnet promise; the links below support the practical instructions and corrections in this guide.
- Upload files to Claude: Supported documents and images.
- Claude personalization features: Account instructions, projects, and skills.
The “ATS score” in the clip is an AI-generated estimate, not a measurement of a particular employer’s system.